Soon after Independence ,
we adopted economic planning to achieve quick economic development. We had
hoped that such planned development would remove poverty in a short time and
bring prosperity to every nook and corner of the country. We have, however,
been disappointed as poverty still exists on a large scale and the inequalities
in the levels of income between the rich and the poor continue to expand.
The planning we mentioned above is executed in the
form of 5-year plans. In these plans the policies and programmes are formulated
centrally at the top. The Planning Commission is the highest policy-making body
in this set-up. These plans are implemented at the lower levels like the state,
district, blocks, panchayats etc.
However, such central planning could not fulfill
many local needs, and local resources also could not be mobilized for use in
the implementation of the plans as all funds were allocated centrally. Many
local environmental concerns were also neglected in the formulation and
implementation of the plans.
To remove these deficiencies of central planning,
efforts are being made to involve people at the local level in the formulation
and implementation of plans.
Such planning is known as decentralized planning.
OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
• Define the concept of decentralized planning;
• Describe the evolution of decentralized planning,
and
• Discuss the dimensions of decentralized planning.
CONCEPT OF
DECENTRALIZED PLANNING
Decentralization, interpreted in simple terms,
would mean moving away from the center or deconcentration. In the context of
development, which is our concern here, decentralization means transfer of
certain authority and power in the matter of formulation and implementation of
development plans from the highest organization
or institution at the national level or state level
to organisations or institutions at the sub-state level.
The lower level, which includes district, block and
panchayat will have a particular role in the planning exercise and will be
vested with the powers and the
responsibilities associated with the role. In a
truly decentralized situation such power will include the power to determine
goals and targets and to raise resources locally.
Decentralized Planning can, thus, be defined as a
type of planning where local organisations and institutions formulate, adopt,
execute actions and supervise the plan without interference by the central
body.
EVOLUTION
OF DECETNRALIZED PLANNING
Thus decentralized planning has evolved in India in fits
and starts over the years. Its evolution can be divided into five phases for a
brief examination.
Phase – I: The Community Development Phase
The period includes the First Five Year Plan
(1951-56) and the Second Five Year Plan (1956-61). During the First Plan the
Community Development (CD) programme was started with great enthusiasm to give
concrete shape to Gandhi’s ideal of a self-reliant village. Significantly, the
programme was started on October 2, 1952 in 55 selected blocks of the country
to coincide with the birthday of the Mahatma. It was designed as a people’s
movement. According to the then ministry of Community Development, Government
of India, “The initiative for Community Development programme comes from the
people themselves. Village Communities not only choose the priorities according
to which the problems are to be tackled, but they also undertake the major
responsibility for implementing them. The role of the Government is to assist
all these activities at every stage. Officials guide and help the villagers,
provide technical advice and organise supplies, services and finance”.
The programme was implemented through the National
Extension Service. In practice, however, the method adopted for the purpose was
“top-down” in which all the directions came from the centre. But such
directions neither reflected local needs, nor came with the necessary financial
and technical resources. Therefore, the members of the community did not take
much interest in the programme as was hoped for.
Phase - II : The Panchayati Raj Phase
This (1960-70) phase marks the creation of the
Panchayati Raj institutions following the recommendations of the Balwantrai
Mehta Committee set up to study the working of the CD projects. The Committee
made an historic observation relating to decentralization: “So long as we do
not discover or create a representative and democratic institution which will
supply the local interest, supervision and care necessary to ensure that
expenditure of money upon local projects conforms with needs and wishes of the
locality, invest it with adequate power and assign to it appropriate finances
we will never be able to evoke local initiative in the field of development.”
According to the
Balwantrai Mehta Committee’s recommendations the Panchayati Raj system was to
have three tiers at the village, block and districtlevels. At the village and block levels there were
to be elected democratic bodies. At the district level there was to be an
advisory body under the Chairmanship of the District Collector. MPs, MLAs and
other important persons were to be its members. The elected bodies were to be
entrusted with planning and development activities.
Panchayati Raj institutions were set up in many
states following this report. But at the district level this institution was
not regarded as a separate level of government. No Panchayat Samiti or Zilla
Parishd at the block and district levels developed a proper development profile
of the area. Political leaders dominated the meetings at the Panchayat Samiti
and Zilla Parishad. All the development decisions were taken by the State and
Central authorities. Lower level units were given guidelines for target and
programme implementation from above. These institutions suffered a great
decline by the end of 1970s.The Ashok Mehta Committee appointed in 1977 to
review the existing situation of Panchayati Raj in the country recommended a
two-tier system.
Phase – III : The Special Programmes Phase
During the 4th 5-Year Plan some important changes
were introduced to economic planning and development in the country. Up to this
time States were getting plan funds from the Centre in the form of assistance
for specific projects proposed by the State and approved by the Centre. But
this system of disbursement of Central assistance for the States was changed
during the 4th Plan. Now the so called Gadgil Formula came into play whereby
block allocation were given by the Centre to the States on the basis of 30%
grant and 70% loan irrespective of schemes and priorities adopted by the
States. This can be described as a step towards decentralization of the
planning process from the Centre to the States. The States now had to build up
and strengthen their planning machinery to utilize the
funds.
Around this time it was also realized that the
economic growth achieved in the country so far through the 5-Year Plans had not
benefited all groups of society and all
regions uniformly. A need for the launch of special
schemes to specifically benefit these areas and groups were felt. This led to
the introduction of some special programmes in the plan like the following:
• The Pilot Intensive Rural Employment Project
(PIREP)
• The Small Farmers Development Agency Programme
(SFDAP)
• The Marginal Farmers and Agricultural Labourers
Agencies Programme (MFALAP)
• The Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP)
• The Tribal Areas Development Programme (TADP)
• The Hill Areas Development Programme (HADP)
• The Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)
A look at the titles of these programmes makes it
clear that now the emphasis in rural development was given on “target groups”
and “target areas”. The Development Block was viewed as the most suitable unit
for this kind of area planning. Activitiessuitable for the area were to be planned and
implemented with close involvement of the local people. A Working Group on
Block- Level Planning appointed by the Government under the chairmanship of
Prof. Dantwala prepared guidelines for blocklevel planning. But later on, with
the change of government and adoption of a new 6th Plan (1980-89) the emphasis
of local planning changed from the Block-level to the District-level.
Phase – IV : The District Planning Phase
The Sixth and Seventh Five Year Plans during this
period (1980-90) continued with the special programmes in old and new forms.
Decentralized Planning at the district and local levels were intensely
discussed during this period. The government set up a Working Group on District
Planning under the Chairmanship of C.H.Hanumanth Rao in 1982.
The Working Group recommended a unified planning
process at the district level covering all sectoral programmes. It gave a
detailed prescription for organizing planning at the district level relating to
methodology, institutions and other prerequisites.
The G.V.K.Rao Committee appointed in 1985 to
recommend administrative arrangements for rural development also pointed out
that the district plan should not be viewed simply as a segment of the State
Plan. It should be conceived and executed at the district level and integrated
into the State Plan. Both the committees provided detailed guidelines to the
states to reorganize planning below the State level. Many state governments
went for decentralized planning in their own ways while following these
guidelines generally.
Phase – V : The Panchayati Raj Revival
PhaseDecentralized Planning depends to a great deal on the devolution of
functions and powers from government at the top to the local levels. The
Panchayati Raj institutions( PRIs ) form the lower level authorities in our
country. It has been seen, however, that even when powers and functions are
given up to these institutions, something is held back for exercise by
competing agencies. Very often the weak constitutional position of the
Panchayati Raj institutions was the reason for this neglect.
The Government has
tried to strengthen the PR institutions by turning them into constitutional
units of self-government through the 73rd Amendment to the Constitution in 1993.
As many as 29 subjects have been identified for the PRinstitutions. Many States
have already devolved considerable number of functions and powers to these
institutions with the power to mobilize resources. At present the trend all
over the country is to move fast towards decentralized planning through
PRinstitutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment